PUA News Internet Article Research Center 

RE: Closed Door Session Of Congress

Investigation into the allegations presented by the Hal Turner Show about fall of America preparations by Congress

Findings: 3-17-08 3:00pm EST

There is currently nothing to support Hal Turner Show’s allegations, which appear propaganda based on our research. Not one legitimate news source confirms the article’s allegations. No witnesses to the closed door House meeting have gone on record (which would be a violation of law under current closed door rules). 

This story is only verifiable by: 1) having been reported by a legitimate news agency adhering to journalistic reporting competencies: 2) which must include a minimum of two separate and distinct sources who were present in the chamber when such claimed discussions took place (who can remain anonymous) and can therefore be reported as such (as anonymous sources). Hal Turner Show has not met this standard insofar as we can tell. 

Historically, such high importance insider news reports are only entrusted to key journalists in the press and rarely, if ever, radio talk shows.

Until such bona fide evidence is forthcoming, the Hal Turner Show article remains strictly propaganda at best. 

*****

References

AP News (via My Way News)

House Closes Its Doors for Spying Bill by Pamela Hess / 3-14-08

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080314/D8VD50JG0.html

[Article confirms closed door session of House to discuss limitations on phone call and e-mail surveillance.]

Washington Post

Capitol Briefing by Ben Pershing /  3-13-08

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/03/house_may_hold_rare_closed_ses.html

[Article discusses the request to go into a House secret session]

PDF Report On Congressional Secret Hearings Dates & Rules

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/03/on_fisa_no_endgame_in_sight.html

******

Original Hal Turner Article / 3-13-08

Source: http://www.halturnershow.com/

SPECIAL "CLOSED SESSION" OF U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED A LOT MORE THAN THE PENDING SECURITY SURVEILLANCE PROVISIONS

LAST NIGHTS SESSION WAS ONLY THE FOURTH TIME IN 176 YEARS THAT CONGRESS CLOSED ITS DOORS TO THE PUBLIC

Word has begun leaking from last nights special, closed-door session of the United States House of Representatives.

Not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they were also bluntly warned about:

the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008,

the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009,

the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse,

advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government,

The detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA,

the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses,

the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest

the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool),

the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon.

Members of Congress were FORBIDDEN to reveal what was discussed and ABC News via WCPO web site at the link below CONFIRMS congress members were FORBIDDEN to talk about it!

Several are so furious and concerned about the future of the country, they have begun leaking info. More details coming later today and over the weekend. SPREAD THE WORD!!!

Original Hal Turner Article / 3-13-08

Source: http://www.halturnershow.com/

SUPREME COURT DECISION ON SECOND AMENDMENT MAY REQUIRE OVERTHROW OF U.S. GOVERNMENT!

COURT TO HEAR CASE THIS WEEK; ISSUE DECISION BY JUNE

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the single biggest Constitutional matter to be heard by the US Supreme Court since the "Dred Scott v. Sanford" decision. The court will decide if the complete ban on gun ownership, enacted by Washington, D.C., violates the Second Amendment.

If they (rightly) uphold a lower court decision, then the DC gun ban is unconstitutional because INDIVIDUALS have a right to keep and bear arms.

If they (wrongly) overturn the lower court decision, the private ownership of firearms could be rendered illegal in one fell swoop. After such a decision, we would see almost immediate efforts in every state to outlaw firearms ownership, require them to be surrendered and then forcibly seized from those who refuse to surrender.

Make no mistake, this case before our Supreme Court could very well start a second Civil War, the same way the "Dred Scott v. Sanford"Decision sparked the first Civil War.

Think about it: The economy is tanking and headed for severe depression. The government is all but bankrupt. Our currency is failing. There's talk of merging the USA with Canada and Mexico. The ONLY thing standing in the way of all those things is the private ownership of guns by Americans.

Will the "New World Order" crowd use this Supreme Court case to take care of the single item standing in their way? You better believe it.

Folks, if the Supreme Court ignores the plain language of the Second Amendment and rules that individuals DO NOT have the right to keep and bear arms, in my opinion we will be left with no choice but to immediately take out that court and move against the entire federal government.

Extended PUA Opinion – Based On Two Above Articles And What We Know Already

Given the state of the economy and fall of the dollar, spike in oil, major crisis in housing and banking, and other recent economic developments, as well as the pending Supreme Court ruling on the ban of guns in the US, the potential for wide scale rioting and disobedience by the overwhelming majority of the US citizenry who own guns is clearly real. Therefore, the potential for this story being  foretelling appears plausible, particularly if Washington insiders who were in the chamber were on the inside track of key developments, as yet unknown to the public (assuming the Hal Turner story has any merit).

As the PUA has illustrated in other articles, we believe this economic melt-down is being deliberately orchestrated by the super-wealthy North American Union (NAU) globalist toward ensuring a hungry and submissive American public who will accept the NAU concept in short order.

The PUA’s position is that at the point when the US government seeks to take away guns from the US citizenry and clearly deny their Constitutional Rights, that act should be the unifying signal to the American people that their government is no longer representative of the people and has become officially tyrannical, thusly triggering the original Declaration of Independence mandate set by the Founding Fathers that states it is the Right and Duty of the American people to overthrow such tyrannical governments and set in place a new government that is representative of the people and their liberty. 

History reminds us that when Independence was fought for, the term militia applied strictly to private individual citizens who informally grouped into militias in protection of their towns and colonies; that the term militia, until recent times, has never been applied to any officially operated group controlled by either the state or federal government, so therefore attempting to make such an interpretation of the Constitution’s Second Amendment as such (i.e. attempting to say only states have the right to form militias and only militias or State Guards can own guns) would be clearly either incompetent or a deliberate ruse on the part of the US Supreme Court and in all cases an unjustifiable and deceptive interpretation.

The Second Amendment, which was such highly regarded and revered for the security of democracy to our Founders—to the point that is was intended to be the First Amendment but delayed due to a lack of agreement in the precise wording—was a product of a people who had just faced tyrannical oppression and the attempt of the ruling government to disarm them toward ensuring their servitude. The Second Amendment was created as the last check-and-balance in our democracy—a final safeguarding aspect that sought to keep the government from trying to become ruler of the people instead of servant to them.

The only thing standing between the people and the forced-on-them, premeditated, and officially sanction (by the US State Department) North American Union is the collective will and guns of the American people.

The globalist agenda knows the American people will never stand for a permanent dismantling of their Constitution or sovereignty or an open border with the narco-kleptocracy Mexico and the infusion of another 80 million impoverished Latinos swamping in to take down the US standard of living and economy—for what Latin country can present itself equal to any First World country of the world given most have been sovereign nations much longer than the US and all embrace kleptocracy as a norm, not the exception--a fact that has distinguished the US as a superior social construct, culture, and government model now being placed in jeopardy due to corruptive US politics that now routinely succumb to the transnational corporations pushing the NAU--the super-wealthy globalist with no allegiance to the US whatsoever.