United States Positioning To Take Over Mexico and It’s Wealth: American Children To Inherent Mass Poverty Under NAU

WASHINGTON D.C. - JULY 31, 2007

US President Bush, Mexican President Fox, and Canadian Prime Minster Martin in March of 2005 launched the first salvo toward the destruction of their respective country’s sovereignties and constitutions when they signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) during secret meetings held in Waco, Texas. The details of the meeting were eventually revealed publicly.

The following excerpt was taken directly from the US government’s operated Web site (www.spp.gov) and its original drafting sponsor, the Council of Foreign Relations, which has maintained a tight foreign policy grip on the White House for more than 4 decades (regardless of who has been president):

We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that “our security and prosperity are mutually dependant and complementary.” Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.  —Council on Foreign Relations

In addition to promoting open borders between Mexico and the US, the plan, pundits are suggesting, ends with Mexico and Canada being added to the United States—the apparent goal, some claim, is to eventually take-over the oil fields of Mexico and its abundant natural mineral wealth in the south and assume control of Canada’s abundance of timber and water reserves in the north--water having become the "new oil."

The plan continues to move forward in great secrecy and under the disguise of NAFTA. The next meeting of the SPP is planned in Canada on August 20-21, 2007 in Montebello, Quebec where President George Bush, Mexican President Felipe Calderon, and  Canadian Prime Minister Steven Harper will meet privately to continuing laying the groundwork for the NAU. Bureaucrats and corporate leaders will comprise the bulk of the working groups. The public is being deliberately kept blind to the realities and is not allowed to review or debate the planning. However grassroots groups from the US and Canada will be arriving in the area to protest—unfortunately, a news black-out has been issued so much of the protesting will remain unheard by most Americans or Canadians. Most Mexicans grassroots organizers remain unaware that the NAU efforts even exist while few citizens in Mexico have ever heard of the concept.

"We don't want Gringos coming in and taking over our country--we would never let that happen," said one Tijuana businessman who asked to remain anonymous. 

"Who will stop them?" asked his wife. "All our paisanos [countrymen] are moving to the US--there's not going to be anyone here left to defend Mexico," she added. "I think the Gringos have out-smarted us with immigration---they get cheap workers and we lose our country---what a deal!"

“Such planning is in direct violation of all three country’s constitutions and should be considered treasonous,” said Patriot Union of America spokesperson Frosty Wooldridge. “The police—and if the police refuse to do it, then the public—should begin rounding up these people, making arrests, and under the law, holding trials to determine their complicity in this treasonous conspiracy that extends all the way to the top leadership of all three countries."

"I've been living in Mexico for the past 20 years and if you mix our two countries, forget it. We'll be able to bribe every cop in the states and the drug mafias will run everything--I don't even leave my house at night because of the kidnapping in this town has gotten so bad--who's the bright idiot that thought that [NAU] concept up?" said Bobby Marcum, a retired American living in Rosarito, Baja.

Many pundits claim that all three countries will suffer if North America is created: 

1. Mexico will be flooded with American businessmen taking control over Mexican tourism, oil, banking, and mining while millions of US workers displaced by illegal immigration in the US will swamp into southern Mexico to take up jobs with newly established American companies, effectively destroying the delicate Mexican culture and lifestyle;  
2. Canada will also see a great influx of Americans swamping in to assume control of logging enterprises and to build hundreds of new miles of aqueducts and manmade rivers to funnel water to the southern states in the US—environments once pristine will become highly contaminated and polluted as the newly formed country removes most environmental restrictions (as has been done previously under the European Union model that paved the way for the NAU); 
3. The US, once a melting pot of kindred or like-minded immigrants who came to its shores to adopt the American lifestyle, language, culture, and seek its prosperity would find themselves increasingly balkanized, with ignorant Third World people and their cultures unable and unwilling to assimilate or to communicate to each other as they maintain their root languages and cultures. Tens of millions of impoverished Mexicans would continue to swamp into American cities and consume what’s left of their public resources while the country continued to spiral into poverty more akin to current-day Mexico, dragging Canada down with it as its poverty roles also spike toward 60% of the population. Meanwhile, many US cities would become overstressed by overpopulation and its demands on resources such as water and housing (which will eventually force the removal of many environmentally protected lands in lieu of much needed housing). Government corruption, so endemic and ubiquitous in Latin countries and cultures, would be dramatically imposed on the US by a human tsunami of both legal and illegal immigrants from Mexico and other Latin countries. The corruptive processes would collapse the country's First World style of law enforcement and replace it with a new Third World model as the strain of dealing with millions of new-comers severely taxed law enforcement resources across the US. Social and economic pressures from job losses and balkanization would likely implode into full scale race wars if the transition period takes place within less than two short decades, as is currently planned, leaving too little time for social adjustments and assimilation. 

In the end, the elite planners of the SPP and North American Union are not interested in creating a larger and more prosperous United States. Their interests are much more capitalistic—super-elite transnational industrialists (the backers of the NAU) will be able to usurp once monopolized industries and resources held by each country while pressing poverty onto the masses of all three countries, making them dependant on the state for their subsistence, hence more easily controllable under the new form of government and its unique constitution--a socialistic form pioneered under the European Union model with roots extending to WWII Germany and Hitler's post-war planners.

Perhaps more alarming is the fact that this new country, to be named "North America," will eliminate democracy in all three countries and replace it with an aristocracy of unelected officials—gone will be all Mexican, US, and Canadian individual rights and their respective country’s laws—all replaced by a new form of socialism that is now flushing out under the European Union model that has previously paved the way--never mind that its wiping out human rights and gutting the European middle-class. 

How do we know that the NAU is real and not a so called "urbane legend," which some perhaps incompetent or complicit news agencies have reported? Easy--it's in writing and signed by all three country leaders and formulated on the policies devised by the Council on Foreign Relations whose top organizers belong to another group, the Trilateral Commission, the very same transnational industrialist and bankers that brought the world the European Union, which displays nearly all dastardly ailments being predicted for the NAU--step two in their plan.

"A 25-kilometre security perimeter is designed to prevent protestors and critics from getting anywhere near the [SPP] meeting… but [we’re] determined to break the silence and ensure that citizens’ voices are heard,” says the Council of Canadians Web site. "The SPP – which is being implemented without any public or parliamentary scrutiny – is about eliminating Canada’s ability to set its own independent regulatory standards, environmental protection measures, energy security, foreign, military, immigration and a frighteningly wide range of other policies. The decisions that Harper, Bush and Calderon make from Aug. 20-21 will affect the food we eat, the air we breathe, and the human rights and civil liberties we enjoy,” they warn. 

“Thousands of laws in both the US, Mexico, and Canada have already been transformed behind the scenes to make all three countries more compatible with one another,” said Wooldridge. “This is not fantasy or conspiracy theory stuff, this is hard-cast reality moving forward under a veil of secrecy, sort of like how a matador moves up on the bull from behind the flag—right before he drives deep that killing blade—the bull never sees it until it’s too late,” he said.

Learn more about the NAU, SPP, and other political issues at the www.patriotunion.org. Mr. Bonn is the Founder of the Patriot Union of America, a nonpartisan national voting union for the “common good.” 

##